<x-flowed>Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-03-23 13:52 -0600
>So...How about major releases indicated by a particular family (genus?),
>like Maple, and individual releases indicated by specific variety
>(species?...I'm forgetting how the 5 latin catagories fit with common
>names...).
>
>This would give something like:
>
>1st major release:
>Silver Maple
>
>Incremental releases:
>Sugar Maple
>Red Maple
>Japanese Maple
>etc...
>
>2nd Major release:
>White Oak
>
>Incremental releases:
>Burr Oak
>Pin Oak
>Live Oak
>etc...
>
>If this seems OK to everyone, we just need to start fighting about which
>plant family to start with, or just let me (or my wife the landscape
>architect/gardener) pick one.
>
>Of course, each release would also have a numeric version/revision ID to
>avoid ambiguity, but names are easier to remember & market.
Charles,
This is excellent! I can't begin to express my pleasure with this idea.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
