Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> I've had my interest renewed in updating Eigerstein, with the
>> realization that Eigerstein ash is broken. I seem to remember having
>> problems with ash in LRP too, but with some patches I received from
>> Erik Andersen (seems to me) I managed to recompile ash and now it
>> works.
>>
>> What I propose is to update every binary (and/or library) possible
>> with a newer version. This does not include major shifts (like glibc
>> 2.0 to 2.1 or 2.2) but would include updating everything else like ip,
>> tracedump, ash, etc. I would staunchly refuse to change the scripts.
>
This is something I have considered doing at least for my own use. I
have even been thinking about making exactly this proposal to Charles.
So if my help is wanted I would like to assist at this.
>>
>> Would such an upgrade be respectable enough for EigersteinBeta3 ?
>>
>> This would at least extend the life of the current Eigerstein images
>> for a little while, and make more things work...
>
>
> I would LOVE to see this happen. I just haven't had time to go digging
> through all the new stuff you've compiled and replace the existing versions.
> If anyone else has time to make this happen, you'll get my full support, and
> what help I have time to provide (I can at least make the self-extracting
> images, since I blew the $$ for a licensed copy of WinImage).
>
I think that money was well-spent, as it makes LRP quite a bit more
accessible for the average cable/adsl user.
Ewald Wasscher
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
