Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-04-19 16:13 -0500
> >I suggest we begin checking in other shell-scripts, like linuxrc,
> >POSIXness, the backup-scripts/apkg, etc. into CVS as well. Has anyone
> >given any thought to how the CVS archive should be structured? Should we
> >have seperate directories for different functions (ie linuxrc vs.
> >POSIXness), and should different distributions (LRP, Oxygen, EigerStein)
> >be seperate CVS trees, or just seperate branches?
>
> I'm for separate trees. It allows more flexibility to the release lead
> developer. Although, branches are better if everyone wants to work from the
> same base.
I agree that there should be separate trees; one of the most dramatic
changes in Oxygen is in the linuxrc startup script - it really isn't
like anything else.
The CDROM ISO contains the basic tree I would probably use, contained
within src/base.... the rest of the src directory would be packages.
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
