Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-17 22:33 +0200
>Everybody,
>
>I forget to mention that with *BSD you can check out the source code from
>CVS and "simply" do something like:
>
>root@mybsd:/usr/src # make world
>
>And rebuild the entire system from scratch. I think that is so _very_
>cool. That is one more reason why I prefer to have the full source code
>(no tarballs, no diffs) in CVS.
Ewald,
Would this make it more difficult for us to track our changes to the
original tarballs?
>>I didn't do anything else, because you and David were still discussing
>>the package tree structure. Also, I was unsure if the script packages
>>belonged in the package tree or not.
>>
>>I think the first thing we need to do is decide if the package tree
>>should be split into categories (e.g. net, utils, editors, etc.). Or, do
>>we place them in the package tree root? If we split them into categories,
>>what ones should we use?
>
>Do you think the amount of packages will make this necessary? I doubt that.
We have over 100 packages that I'm aware of. I'm sure that number will
increase once we start importing packages into cvs. I think the packages
tree might get cluttered without categories.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
