I gotta say I agree with this suggestion. Enough of the core elements have
been changed and updated that it should probably be call Eigerstein3, if
only to differentiate it fro the base Eigherstein2 build. It will aid in
troubleshooting issues specific to it.
----------------------------------------------
Steven Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sacramento, CA http://leaf.blkmtn.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S.C.Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 10:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Eigerstein?BETA pre-release
>
>
> Ewald:
> Hello! Great work, cool. This might be an old question, but
> I thought I'd ask: should we call your update, perhaps, Eigerstein3?
>
> -Scott
>
> At 6:56 PM +0200 5/20/01, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >With help and approval from Charles Steinkuehler I have made
> an updated
> >version of Eigerstein2BETA. The goal was not to deviate too much from
> >the original Eigerstein2BETA. All binaries have been upgraded to the
> >last stable version. Other major changes are:
> >- replaced ae with e3 as the default editor.
> >- moved ae, ncurses and setserial to seperate packages
> >- introduced a modified lrcfg.back.script that uses busybox tar
> >
> >A disk image (1743KB) and packages are available for testing here:
> >
> >http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ewaldw/Eigerstein2BETA/20010520/
> >
> >On the todo list for the final release are:
> >- update sh-httpd in the weblet package
> >- produce some updated kernels
> >
> >If some people could test this pre-release and provide me
> with merciless
> >feedback I would be grateful.
> >The changelog is attached.
> >
> >Greetings,
> >
> >Ewald Wasscher
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
