Pim van Riezen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > libnsl appears to be required by:
> >
> > cpio
> > strace
> > tcpd
> >
> > I've compiled tcpd (tcpwrappers) without NIS support, but with glibc
> > 2.2 (sigh). The i386-glibc20-linux-gcc compiler complains about using
> > -c and -o with multiple compilations (huh?).
>
> Care to post the error output? Coercing anal compilers into behaving has
> become sort of an uninvited hobby of mine ;)
Heh. I know the feeling.
Here it is:
COMPILE TIME ERRORS FOR TCP WRAPPERS AGAINST GLIBC 2.0
make[1]: Entering directory
`/pub/oxygen/src/net/security/tcpwrappers/tcp_wrappers_7.6'
i386-glibc20-linux-gcc -O2 -g -DFACILITY=LOG_DAEMON
-DHOSTS_ACCESS -DDAEMON_UMASK=022 -DREAL_DAEMON_DIR=\"/usr
/sbin\" -DPROCESS_OPTIONS -DKILL_IP_OPTIONS -DSEVERITY=LOG_INFO
-DRFC931_TIMEOUT=10 -DHOSTS_DENY=\"/etc/hosts.deny\"
-DHOSTS_ALLOW=\"/etc/hosts.allow\" -DSYS_ERRLIST_DEFINED
-DHAVE_WEAKSYMS -D_REENTRANT backadm.cuna.com -o tcpd.o -c
tcpd.c
i386-glibc20-linux-gcc: cannot specify -o with -c and multiple
compilations
make[1]: *** [tcpd.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/pub/oxygen/src/net/security/tcpwrappers/tcp_wrappers_7.6'
make: *** [linux] Error 2
Of course, like everything else, it compiles perfectly with glibc
2.1. Wonder how long that will last?
Make me think I got them wrong: I couldn't compile against glibc 2.0,
but with 2.1 it compiled fine. Haven't got glibc 2.2 into the shop
yet.
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
