David Douthitt, 2001-05-29 10:12 -0500
>David Douthitt wrote:
> >
> > Thanks! Here they are. Didn't realize how big the OpenSSL libraries
> > would be; I suppose this means that the OpenSSH binary will shrink to
> > a fraction of its size if you use the OpenSSL dynamic libraries...
>
>Ack!
>
>I hadn't intended to send that to the list....
David,
It was held for approval, because the attachment was to large.
Unfortunately, I haven't caught up with my email backlog yet, so I approved
the post. Sorry.
>For practically every list that I'm on, a Reply doesn't go to the list
>but to the mail writer. LEAF (and Sourceforge) are pretty much about
>the only ones that get it right.....
>
>I sure do get tired of having to type "Linux Router Project" to send
>mail to the LRP list - and they are NOT alone...
This is a feature (reply-to munging) that can be set by the list admin. The
Mailman authors are discouraging its use though. They want to eventually
remove it from Mailman. They want all of the mail clients to implement
reply-to-list.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
