> David, > Would it be a good idea for us to follow the LSB 1.0 specs? > > http://www.linuxbase.org/ > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lsb AFAIK, we can't follow LSB and still fit on a floppy, but we should probably try to not break any LSB rules. It may be possible to make a superset of some LEAF distribution LSB compliant, but I'll have to read through more of the spec... Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Tim Wegner
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] More packaging enhancements David Douthitt