David Douthitt wrote: > > Matt Schalit wrote: > > > (gdb) while 1 > > > step > > > end > > Almost missed this - you can really DO this? Cute!
You gotta read, if'n you want to lern. I'm not fooling around here. > > 304 *(u_char *)(&odd_byte) = *(u_char *)p; > > This is interesting - does this really work or does it clobber > something? Not sure what you mean. It look redundant. Btw, all the line numbers are shifted off by one compared to my gatping.c. I'm not sure why. For instance, the source that Scott posted has the printf() at line 178. ---- Matthew > > 312 > > send_ping (s=5, h=0x804a958) at gatping.c:179 > > 179 printf ( "Problem with ping - returned %d\n",n ) ; > > What is n here? > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x17f0c4 in () > > Single stepping until exit from function __libc_free, > > which has no line number information. > > > > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > The program no longer exists. > > The program is not being run. > > (gdb) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > So I'm figuring something with the printf(), because there > > ain't no printf'ing going on that I see. > > That would be something in the C library then. If gatping is just a > massive ICMP ping flood :-) then let me try it here on my Red Hat glibc > 2.1.3 system and see what happens. > > > If David's reading, he might be able to recall if we were > > having printf problems when converting over to 2.1.3. > > I don't remember any. > > > Thanks, > > Yurtle > > Are you a turtle now? Yurtle the Turtle? :-) > > _______________________________________________ > Leaf-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
