On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 05:07, Manfred Schuler wrote:
> I followed the threads on hardware-wp. The last
> information I read was that you have to do some
> SMD soldering to get the write protection feature.
> I think that this is not well suited for many
> people as you need some soldering experience to
> do this.

Manfred,
You are correct on both points.

> The last information i got from apacer is that
> it is possible to write protect the device, but
> they don't sell devices with write protection as
> there are not enough customers to request this 
> feature.

I believe Apacer is talking about the version with the zero ohm resister
build time option enabled on the ATA-Disk Module. I have the standard
version without the build time option. My father and I are going to
attempt post purchase modification of this module to enable
write-protect.

> Also I am a little bit astonished as all people
> on the list agree that any additional level of
> protection is an improvement. But in the discussion
> about software-wp people argument as if it would
> make things worse.

We've lived with hardware write-protection for a long time, and we know
it works. There is usually resistance to change, but it's rarely
insurmountable.

> I still think it is an improvement of security to
> protect the ramdisk and to restrict access to the
> boot device as far as possible. This increases the
> required skills of an intruder and also the chances
> to detect an intruder.
> If you check the mounting options of the ramdisks 
> every second, an intruder has only one second to
> compromise the system and to install and run the
> tools to hide the intrusion.
> 
> The protection can completely be done in a package.
> A few changes (make /var a seperate file system,
> separate mount from busybox) in the base system
> would make things easier and do no harm to the
> system. The user can then decide to use the package
> or not.
> 
> I'm short of free time at the moment, but maybe in
> the next weeks I get the occasion to make a
> beta-version of this package. I will post then the
> information on the list when it is available.

Please do. It's always worthwhile to look at new ideas. Please post your
package information on the devel list when it's ready.


-- 
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to