On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 20:49, Simon Blake wrote: > Sorry? I *wrote* a glibc 2.2.x howto (such as it is), and provide > modified bering root.lrp and initrd.lrp files. The availability, or > otherwise, of IDE addons doesn't answer my basic question, which is > still "why are people dwelling on read-only as a requirement".
Simon, For me the ability to return to a known state, is the main benefit to hardware write-protect. It appears that this isn't a priority for you, and that is fine. I agree with you that ADM/DOM IDE compatible flash devices are nice. Any time you can move to solid state increases your reliability. We all have slightly different ideas on how things should work. That is why we use the development model we do. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
