25.10.2012 10:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
> Le 24/10/2012 19:22, Andrew a écrit :
>> 24.10.2012 17:25, Yves Blusseau пишет:
>>> Le 24/10/2012 15:22, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>>>> Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew:
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active
>>>>> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade
>>>>> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled
>>>>> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router).
>>>>>
>>>>> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ?
>>>>>> What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Yves
>>>> Hi;
>>>>
>>>> I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that
>>>> at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit
>>>> better than 4.x) and worth a release.
>>>>
>>>> We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is
>>>> capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures
>>>> ("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO
>>>> no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle.
>>>>
>>>> I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch
>>>> the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it
>>>> alpha...
>>>>
>>>> BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it?
>>> Hi KP,
>>> all compile fine except oprofile package.
>>> You can use the buc5-x86_64-toolchain branch and the
>>> x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc toolchain to test.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yves
>>>
>> oprofile just requires libbfd assembled with -fPIC - I committed
>> changes, it seems like now it's assembled correctly.
> Do you know why is it working previously with 32bit toolchain without
> the -fPIC flag ?
No, I don't know. For some reasons libbfd under 64bit should be
position-independent.
>> P.S. For some reasons gcc stack protector was disabled (maybe something
>> fails to compile with it); I'll try to enable it.
> Great !
>
> Yves
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
