Le 6 juil. 2014 à 15:57, kp kirchdoerfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit : >> >> If we ALWAYS build busybox with the vi applet we don't need to build >> separate initrd. > > True, but it consumes some more kb, which arent't useful for most of the > users. > Keep in mind - if we want to support MIPS-based routers we need to be small > as > possible, usually they don't have a lot of RAM (32 to 64 MB AFAIK). > True but i made a test with or without vi applet:
busybox without vi: 371140 busybox with vi: 388248 so the difference is only of 17k. For me it's better to always compile busybox with vi (so there an editor in ALL platform in initrd), than to have a mechanism to enable/disable vi applet depending on the platform architecture (just to gain 17k). The simple way is always the best ? Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
