On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, John Desmond wrote:

> --- Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Continuing, the reason you need ramdisk.lrp (or
> > ramlog.lrp) is because
> > otherwise there is no provision for creating and
> > formatting additional
> > ramdisks.  You could put mount entries in fstab, but
> > without formatting them
> > first, the ramdisks are pretty much useless.  There
> 
> I hate to appear to be perserverating on this, but I'm
> having trouble understanding how ram0 gets created and
> formatted, but an add-on package is required to format
> the ram1.

"perserverating"? whew!

/dev/ram0 is the root filesystem under LRP.  You should first understand
what it means to be the root filesystem, and a rough idea how it gets
designated as such. Then the complications introduced by initrd and the
LRP approach should make a little more sense.  It is definitely treated
differently than any other file volumes, because of its special status.

You probably ought to read
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Bootdisk-HOWTO/index.html, and "man initrd".

LRP uses a kernel patch that was developed by Dave Cinege to adapt initrd
to use a tar.gz file instead of a preformatted filesystem image to
initialize /dev/ram0 as root.
(http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9905.1/0771.html)

In summary: /dev/ram0 is initialized by the patched kernel, unlike any
other filesystems.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller                        The     .....       .....  Go Live...
DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>        Basics: ##.#.       ##.#.  Live Go...
                                      Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries            O.O#.       #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)               .OO#.       .OO#.  rocks...2k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to