Hi John, Hi Charles

It's impossible that the Hardware is causing this problems (except the NIC).
The cables are STP cables (shielded) and from a famous swiss cable
manufacturer (not cheap). Anyway, we had another NIC in the box and with
that one, we had no problems. Now, you may ask "Why do this guy not use the
other NIC which works?". Let's tell you the story about this box:

1. Friend got cable, I configured him a box with to old NIC's (this SMC and
the DEC)
2. Friend uses his cable first without an LPR box. ISP uses MAC address
database to limit clients behind cablemodem (depending on type of
subscription, you may conenct 2 or 4 clients directly to the cable modem).
My friend has the smaller subscription and may connect 2 clients (which also
means two public IP's)
3. ISP MAC address database is bullshit because sometimes, database thinks
that a customer already have 2 or 4 clients connected and the DHCP don't
give out any leases. (You don't get an IP if you connect more than 2 or 4
PC's). MAC addresses which are not active anymore are deleted from the
database after 24h of inactivity.
4. I go to my friend and install the box. I notice the same strange thing as
I described already. My first idea: NIC is damaged. I install a new NIC (a
new and expensive Intel PRO 10/100 PCI) and THE SAME AGAIN. we get a lease
but the connection is VERY slow. We try to connect his PC directly to the
modem again but then, we don't get a lease.
We now think that perhaps the database was causing the problems with the
first NIC because with the new NIC, things don't work either. We think that
the database thought we already have 2 clients before we started to install
the LRP box.
5. After 24hours, the new Intel NIC get's an IP regularly fast (yesterday,
the we got a lease just some seconds before DHCLIENT stops trying) and
everything is working fast.
6. We now (think that we) are sure the database was causing all of our
problems and plan to change the NIC's again to the old one (I want my
expensive Intel back :))
7. We change the NIC's again, same problem. We wait 24 hours
8. STILL the SAME. Now I'm confused. Where is the problem? ISP? NIC? both?

I hate problems where you can't definitely say what's the reason for it
because you don't know everything (My ISP would know it, but you don't get
any useful information from our ISP)


I now think that we should trash this NIC and install a new one.
What do you think? other ideas?

greetings

Sandro Minola

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Johdomi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. September 2001 01:03
> An: Sandro Minola
> Cc: Leaf-User
> Betreff: Re: [Leaf-user] Strange problem with external NIC
>
>
> Check to see if you have a power cable close to the network cable try a
> different cable. I had the same problem with my cable connection.
>
> John
>
> Sandro Minola wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > I've a strange problem with the external NIC of one of my
> boxes. Connections
> > are very laggy and the data throughput is about 400BYTES/s.
> It's a 256Kbit
> > cable connection.
> >
> > Now the strange things:
> > throughput is normal in the very first seconds. then it slows down to
> > 400Bytes/s and stays there (it slows down in steps, not in one step from
> > 25KBytes/s to 400Bytes/s). if i start the download or site
> loading again,
> > speed starts with normal and goes down again.
> > Interface statistics shows over 3000 errors on eth0 (box running about 1
> > hour).
> >
> > What i'm using:
> > Eigerstein2Beta 2.2.19 Kernel
> > SMC Ultra ISA NIC (external, the strange one)
> > DEC EtherWorks (internal, don't makes any problems)
> > DOCSIS CableModem connection 256Kbit
> >
> > there are no kernel messages about the NIC (from the driver or so).
> >
> > any ideas?
> > is this nic damaged? should i trash it?
> >
> > greetings
> > Sandro Minola
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leaf-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to