Hi Paul, Hi all

I think that using a bridging cable modem with LEAF don't decrease speed at
all, even you're using a 486 CPU.
What I know is that using PPPoE is much more CPU intensive than just
masq'in.

I'm using several boxes out there, all with a 512Kbit/128Kbit link (you
don't get a faster cable link in Switzerland for reasonable prices :( ).
The slowest is a 486DX2/33Mhz with 16MB RAM connected to a bridging cable
modem. I can't measure a speed decrease.

---
Sandro Minola           | LEAF Developer (http://leaf.sourceforge.net)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.minola.ch    | http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/sminola
-
worldcontrol:~ # rm -rf /bin/laden

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Rimmer
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-user] Speed Survey
>
>
> Tried both US dslreports speed test servers
> (http://www.dslreports.com/stest) from up here in Canada (Calgary,
> Shawcable) and got the following:
>
> >From Megapath, CA
> Test running..........
> ** Speed 2325(down)/1034(up) kbps **
> (At least 46 times faster than a 56k modem)
> Finish.
>
> >From Linkline, LA
> Test running..........
> ** Speed 2925(down)/947(up) kbps **
> (At least 58 times faster than a 56k modem)
> Finish.
>
> P133 64MB RAM DCDv1.01 with brand new Motorola cable modem (old one was
> definitely slower).
>
> Quite the variance, highest is only slightly slower than the more local
> tucows server that I attained the 3200 download speed from.
>
> I'd be curious to see what other cable modem users are getting and what
> their  config is.
>
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to