> I think, if anything should be broken up, maybe there should be a file
> for the base config (ip's, routing, connection type) and a different
> file for additional config (forwarding, filtering, etc...). This way
> any config done after the initial setup can be done w/o wading through
> anything you won't need to mess with. As things are now, it would likely
> be too much work with DCD to do it now, the next release would be the
> place to do it with since everything is likely to be much different
> anyway.
>
> It could be done with DCD, but a lot of functions are going to have to
> be put in place for variable doubling breaking compatibility
> with the present file. I'm not sure how prepared we are to supporting
> this at the present time.
>
> Thoughts?

There have been a few discussions about this a while ago, and the problems
you bring up are one of the big reasons I want to see the next major release
split the firewalling and networking setup features.

Of course there will have to be a reasonably defined interaction between
these two features (especially for things like PPPoE and DHCP connections
that can change IP's, and be brought up/down unexpectedly).

In keeping with how I'd like to see other configurable features work, a
directory with per-interface configuration files would be nice (similar to
the way RedHat has the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory), but I'd
want something more documented and less confusing.

In general, feel free to abandon the DCD/"mountain" way of doing things...it
seems like the time is ripe for a whole new distribution base, and while I'm
all for backwards compatibility (which is why some of the network.conf
settings are somewhat duplicated, and more confusing than necessary), when
making a major new release, the emphasis switches to doing things "right".

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)



_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to