On Tuesday 05 March 2002 11:44, kevin mudrick wrote:
> > Is this more of what you are thinking???
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/dox/pa.txt
>
> sort of, well, except i don't have a cisco router, so it'd be


Well, this is more like what you are looking to do with ProxyArp.
You should get a good start off of this link anyway:

http://www.casano.com/lrp/proxy_arp.html


Just kill the private network using NAT if you don't need it.

I hope this helps,
~Lynn Avants



#########################################################


> (I have 216.158.54.224/29 routed to 207.245.72.146)
>
>
>                       [Internet]
>
>                          eth0
>
>                LEAF Box (207.245.72.146)
>
>                          eth1
>
>         -------------------------------------
>
>     Computer 1        Computer 2        Computer 3
>  (216.158.54.224)  (216.158.54.225)  (216.158.54.226)
>   (192.168.1.1)     (192.168.1.2)      (192.168.1.3)
>
> With the leaf box only letting ports 22 and 80 inbound to the 3
> computers.
>
> Right now I have the LEAF box as 207.245.72.153, setup as an IP
> masquerading firewall, with port 80 forwarding to computer 3, and
> port 22 forwarding to computer 2.
>
> Would it be better to just have 216.158.54.224, .225, and .226 set as
> aliases for the leaf box, and use the INTERN_SERVERS to forward same
> ports to different internal IPs depending on the external ip?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin

-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to