At 01:12 PM 5/6/02 -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > >I am sorry to confuse you. > >First, let me state that the internal network at this site is comprise >of several private subnets, all listed on the original diagram. > >However, these internal subnets are routed through a Cisco 3640, details >for which are given in the _last_ section of that weblink -- this is >192.168.11.252.
Sorry. I missed this. (I don't have all the prior messages to the list in this thread, so I may have missed where you mentioned the Cisco. Perhaps I was just confused by the presence of a WAN route on the LEAF router.) >Also, I have updated the link: ><http://www.helices.org/tmP/mcaI/mcai_isdn.txt> to include more ping >tests and correlative traceroutes. > >I believe that this explains away Ray's questions. If not, reiterate >and I will deal accordingly. It answers all the *incidental* questions I asked, but not the most important one, to wit: "does the ISDN router [192.168.14.252] know that 192.168.14.254 is its route to 192.168.11.0/24?" Again forgive me if I am being careless, but I didn't see in the expanded Web report *any* information about the configuration of a device with IP address 192.168.14.252. Were I a betting man, I'd bet that this is the location of the problem. All the ping and traceroute failures you report are completely explained by this hypothesized gap in the ISDN router's routing table. >What do you think? > > >Ray Olszewski wrote: >> >> At 11:42 AM 5/6/02 -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: >> [...] >> >OK, I have tried your suggestions -- without success. >> > >> >Please, refer to <http://www.helices.org/tmP/mcaI/mcai_isdn.txt> for the >> >details that you have requested. >> > >> >What do you think? >> >> First, I think the Web link is a nice presentation of the data. Very readable. > >Simple enough -- thank you. > >> Second ... is there a typo in what you posted or do you have a simple >> gateway problem? (Or am I misreading what you posted?) The LEAF router's >> eth0 address is 192.168.11.254, but the client you are pinging from has a >> default gateway address of 192.168.11.252. At least that's how I read these >> lines from the Web stuff you posted: > >See explanation above. > >[ snip ] -- ------------------------------------"Never tell me the odds!"--- Ray Olszewski -- Han Solo Palo Alto, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
