On Sat, 18 May 2002, David Smead wrote:

> Tom,
> 
> Thanks for the reply.   Here's route on the 192.168.3.245.  eth0 is down,
> otherwise it would have the route you suggest.
> 
> knuth:/etc/init.d# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway      Genmask         Flags Metric Ref  Use Iface
> 192.168.3.0     0.0.0.0      255.255.255.0   U     0      0     0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.3.254 0.0.0.0        UG    0      0     0 eth1
> 
> From 192.167.3.245 I can ping both interfaces on thevenin - 192.168.254
> and 192.168.8.24.  I figued that some kind of forwarding must be happening
> there.

No -- no forwarding is required there.

> At the moment I have thevenin mounted on knuth over nfs, so a lot
> of stuff is working over the .3.0 net.
> 
>

>From the ruleset on your router, it appears that you haven't yet 
configured Shorewall -- one of the things that Shorewall does is enable 
forwarding via:

echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 

Have you done that via some other means. 

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep  \ http://www.shorewall.net
ICQ: #60745924  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________________________
Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/


------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to