On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, George Luft wrote: > Following the instructions in > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html#AEN343 > > I added the net/ppp0/- line to the Interfaces file and commented out the > eth0 line. Should I have left eth0 in?
No. > Do I need the dhcp, routefilter, > and norfc1918 options added to the ppp0 line? > PPPoE doesn't use DHCP so you don't need the dhcp option. Routefilter is probably a good idea. Norfc1918 is a good idea unless your ISP assigns RFC 1918 addresses for PPPoE in which case that option is a spectacularly poor choice. > #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS > #net eth0 detect dhcp,routefilter,norfc1918 > net ppp0 - > loc eth1 detect routestopped > > Also, I tried editing the Masq file as shown below, but kept getting errors > saying that "eth0 must be up". > > B/ The masq file (entry 7). With a dial-up modem setup it should look like: > > (...) > #INTERFACE SUBNET > ppp0 eth0 > #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE > > > Reading the documentation provided within the masq file, I think this SUBNET > should be eth1 not eth0 since that is my internal NAT'ed network. That's > what I did and it works. Is this an error in the doc? > "Dial-up modem" != "PPPoE" -- so if the documentation that you are referring to talks about "dial-up modem", that documentation is correct. The key point is that the interface in the SUBNET column should be the one that interfaces to your local network. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
