Julian Church <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's also the possibility that the bulk of those packets are from one or > two harmless sources that you don't really need to worry about - it's > common for cable/ADSL systems to spew forth all sorts of stuff of this > type. If this is the case it might be helpful to fiddle with your firewall > rules so these things don't get logged in the first place.
I believe my ADSL provider is quite clean as far as unnecessary packet spewage goes (and I know my ISP is), but I'll check again. > I'd be inclined to do the latter, mainly because I only really want stuff > that I have to think about in my logs and I find a lot of extra rows of > harmless activity often make more important entries difficult to spot, but > it's your firewall - you should do whichever you want. I don't think this applies in my case, but it's a good point to bring up -- thanks. -- Dan Harkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://harkless.org/dan/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
