On Thursday 30 January 2003 09:28 pm, you wrote: > Hi. Just me again. > > I'm confused about what I can use in Shorewall Policies and Rules to > indicate the Firewall itself. The text seems to tell me I must use $fw > but the initially commented out line in the Policy file uses just fw. > Are $fw and fw interchangeable in rules and policies? Loc, dmz and net > don't need the '$'?
No "$" > BTW, the other day I mentioned that some standard setup file had > allocated IP addresses in the same subnet to my eth1 and eth2. The file > that does that is the interfaces file in Bering if you accept the > initially commented out configuration of the eth2 interface. Have I > missed something here? You can't route between the same subnet.... that would be bridging. In the example 192.168.x.y/24 the "x" is the subnet root for this network, so "x" would have to be different numbers on a /24 network to allow routing between the two interfaces. -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
