What are the signal levels from both sides?

Samuel Abreu de Paula wrote:
Hi... i have that situation:

# ttcp -s -r
ttcp-r: buflen=8192, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001  tcp
ttcp-r: socket
ttcp-r: accept from 200.253.xxx.xxx
ttcp-r: 4194304 bytes in 17.12 real seconds = 239.25 KB/sec +++
ttcp-r: 2653 I/O calls, msec/call = 6.61, calls/sec = 154.96
ttcp-r: 0.0user 1.1sys 0:17real 7% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 0+0csw

station: -root-
# ttcp -n512 -s -t 200.253.187.144
ttcp-t: buflen=8192, nbuf=512, align=16384/0, port=5001  tcp  -> 200.253.xxx.xxx
ttcp-t: socket
ttcp-t: connect
ttcp-t: 4194304 bytes in 2497.68 real seconds = 1.64 KB/sec +++
ttcp-t: 512 I/O calls, msec/call = 4995.36, calls/sec = 0.20
ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.3sys 41:37real 0% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+2pf 0+0csw

The SNR in AP Manager is in good... without packet loss... Is in both sides Orinoco Gold Card with firmware 7.28.

This is, when the station try to upload/send packets the rate is too slow... but for receiving is ok!

Anyone have any idea of what can be???

I already change the entire equipment, the distance between AP1000 and the station is about 600m

Thanks

Samuel Abreu


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



--
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivaschenko
Thunderworx - Senior Systems Engineer (RHCE)



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to