Sorry for the long delay, I was commuting to work and so wasn't in a
position to fiddle with the VPN clients.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:33:27AM -0500, Lynn Avants wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 04:02 pm, Ruchira Datta wrote:
> > I realize I probably need to provide a lot more specific information for
> > anyone to help me, but for now I just have a simple multiple-choice
> > question. Could someone please tell me whether
>
> > b) I need to change the configuration of my Linux laptop
>
> Let's pick b) since the same machine works when booting Win32.
> It appears that your port-forwarding the VPN connection through
> the firewall, so NAT-transversal is NOT the issue. It appears
> that the routing table is NOT setup when the Linux client comes
> up, which is often left to you to configure with many Linux
> clients. Try connecting with the Linux client and compare the
> routing table to that on the Win32 system when connected, this
> should enlighten what you need to add to make everything work.
> --
Thanks very much for your reply. Below is a sample of the routing table
when I'm in Windows.
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.21.1.115 172.21.1.115 1
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 192.168.1.28 2
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 192.168.1.27 2
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
172.21.1.115 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
172.21.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.21.1.115 172.21.1.115 1
192.91.171.51 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.254 192.168.1.27 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.1.115 172.21.1.115 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.27 192.168.1.27 2
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.28 192.168.1.28 2
192.168.1.27 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.28 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.27 192.168.1.27 1
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.28 192.168.1.28 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 172.21.1.115 172.21.1.115 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.1.27 192.168.1.27 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.1.28 192.168.1.28 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.21.1.115 172.21.1.115 1
Default Gateway: 172.21.1.115
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
Here again is a sample of the routing table when I'm in Linux, connected
to the firewall:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.91.171.51 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.1.48 guruseva 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 lo
204.68.140.61 172.21.1.48 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 nlv0
192.168.1.254 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 172.21.1.48 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 nlv0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0 eth0
default 172.21.1.48 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 nlv0
default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 eth0
What jumps out at me is that I have two default gateways in Linux, but
only one in Windows.
Thanks for your help,
Ruchira Datta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
