Hi M, Yes, I thought this would be the case. I'll have to look into this, but either way, a DES VPN is not secure, and I think I'll just tell the guys at the remote end that they have to supply a Linux box with DES support as I don't want to be held responsible for implementing such an insecure VPN solution. :)
Regards, HiltonT On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 15:19, M Lu wrote: > Hi Hilton, > > Bering ipsec.lrp is actually Superfreeswan 1.99.6.2, and I believe that > FreeSWAN does not support single DES. > > M Lu. > > > >From: Hilton Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [leaf-user] ipsec.lrp - does it do plain old DES? > >Date: 06 Jul 2003 12:54:07 +1000 > > > >Hi All, > > > >Does the behring ipsec.lrp module handle the insecure DES protocol? I > >have a need for a DES-based Linux router for a short while, and if this > >works, then I'll use it. Unfortunately, the remote end cannot accept > >any secure IPSEC encryption protocols. :( -- Regards, HiltonT ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
