Route on the XP box should be 

Route add 192.168.51.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.1

Cheers,
Dave.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Neave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 09 October 2003 10:51
> To: Dave Hunt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] 2xNIC Bering won't route? Help!
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, here are the settings for all the hosts.
> 
> The WAP
> 
> IP:   192.168.51.2
> MASK: 255.255.255.0
> GATE: 192.168.51.1
> DNS:  192.168.51.1 (redundant, no DNS yet)
> 
> The XP Box
> 
> IP:   192.168.50.30
> MASK: 255.255.255.0
> GATE: None
> DNS:  None
> 
> ON the XP Box:
> 
> Route add 192.168.51.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.30
> 
> Interfaces file on the bering box: (may not be precise 
> syntax, but the values are correct)
> 
> Auto eth0
> Eth0 static
>       Address 192.168.50.1
>       Masklen 24
>       Broadcast       192.168.50.255
> (no gateway tag)
> 
> auto eth1
> eth1 static
>       address 192.168.51.1
>       masklen 24
>       broadcast       192.168.51.255
> (no gateway tag)
> 
> "ip route show" just has the two networks with their 
> respective adaptors.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 09 October 2003 10:37
> To: James Neave; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] 2xNIC Bering won't route? Help!
> 
> 
> Does the D-Link have it's gateway set up to be 192.168.51.1?
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > James Neave
> > Sent: 09 October 2003 10:14
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [leaf-user] 2xNIC Bering won't route? Help!
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Everybody,
> > 
> > This ones got my hair falling out. A very simple task, which
> > I've done before.
> > 
> > 1 Bering box, 2 NICs (3c905C and rtl8139)
> > 
> > This box has no external connection (yet, still no ADSL),
> > just needs to route between the two eth adaptors
> > 
> > A D-Link WAP (192.168.51.2) is plugged straight into eth1
> > (192.168.51.1) A WinXP (192.168.50.30) box is crossed over 
> > into eth0 (192.168.50.1)
> > 
> > Hosts.allow contains
> > ALL: 192.168.50.0/255.255.255.0
> > ALL: 192.168.51.0/255.255.255.0
> > 
> > Two zones in shorewall, dave and alex (+fw).
> > Dave is bound to eth1, alex to eth0.
> > 
> > Policy is:
> > 
> > Dave        alex    ACCEPT
> > Alex        dave    ACCEPT
> > Fw  all     ACCEPT
> > All fw      ACCEPT
> > 
> > The routes are correctly set, all ping requests flash a light
> > on a NIC somewhere.
> > 
> > Fw can ping it's interfaces, the WAP and the XP box.
> > The XP box can ping both interfaces of the FW box.
> > A wireless client can ping the WAP and the FW box.
> > 
> > But that's it. The XP box cannot see the WAP or any 
> wireless clients.
> > 
> > I could've sworn this worked on Sunday...
> > I'm not doing any NAT, maybe I have to turn NAT off in
> > shorewall config?
> > 
> > Somebody please help, this is driving me nuts...
> > 
> > Thanks again,
> > 
> > James.
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See 
> > the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click 
> > here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l> eaf-user
> > SR 
> > FAQ: 
> > http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
> > 
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to