Hi Ray, thanks for your long answer !
You did catch the typo in this advice, I trust. It creates table 000002I but tries to jump to table 00000I.
You are right, I corrected that typo only in the script, not in my mail....
I would not expect it to, because -A puts the new rules at the *end* of the chain (while -I, if not given a rule placement number explicitly,
Oops. I know, I am knowing nothing. (about iptables ;-)) Thanks for the hint.
puts new rules at the beginning of the chain). In Shorewall, it is likely that some prior rule catches the traffic before it ever sees this
Yes, thats exactly what it seemed to me, when I tried out some rules.
(I just did made up a new thread about accounting-prob ) At the moment I got a running rule to count the bytes. (see other mail) But some new connection-problems occur. Tom mentioned CLAMPMSS. I will try it, although it *is* set to YES. I will set it to NO, just to find out.
I'll report ! Thanks a lot !
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
