Thanks, all!
I have set up one end in the office (bering 1.2 / Shorewall 2.0.9 /
openvpn 1.6) tunnels file:
openvpn:5001,
which I assume defaults to UDP.

Be back at home to do the other end (bering 1.2 / Shorewall 1.4.2 /
openvpn 1.6) and let you know the results. 

Still wrestling how to resolve the routing issue. Might post to openvpn
users as well on this, but with this arrangement:
winxp -- WLAN -- homefw -- Internet -- officefw
  <--- tun 1 -----> <---- tun0 ---------->
 route 216.x.y.z       route 216.x.y.z = external iface of homefw.
The above route commands are identical in both openvpn configs on
homefw.
This causes the second tunnel to come up, tun0 to fail the route
command.
I could change the route command in tun0's config to my ISP's default
gateway and see if that works.
Any thoughts?

TIA
Rick.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:46 PM
To: M Lu
Cc: Tibbs, Richard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Can Multiple openvpn processes run on LEAF?

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:43 -0500, M Lu wrote:
> Tom, can he specify openvpn twice in the tunnel file, e.g.
> 
> openvpn:udp:5000
> openvpn:udp:5001
> 
> I think I had the problems with that so I use generic instead.

You should be able to specify multiple openvpn tunnels using different
ports.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key





-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to