Dear list.
I have a ipsec road warrior config that allows my laptop so successfully
connect to internal machines through a Bering 1.2 firwall with FreeSwan
1.99. I also have an openvpn tunnel connected to another firewall
across the internet. Although I have no openvpn running on the laptop,
the command
ipsec eroute
says (apparently) that the route is connected to tun0, instead of
ipsec0.
Although everything works, why would ipsec make this association?
TIA
Rick.
# ip addr sho
<---- snipped ---->
5: ipsec0: <NOARP,UP> mtu 16260 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 10
link/ether 00:01:03:e1:9c:3d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 137.x.y.z/24 brd 137.45.192.255 scope global ipsec0
6: ipsec1: <NOARP> mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
7: ipsec2: <NOARP> mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
8: ipsec3: <NOARP> mtu 0 qdisc noop qlen 10
link/ipip
9: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
10
link/ppp
inet 10.1.10.2 peer 10.1.10.1/32 scope global tun0
firewall: -root-
# ipsec eroute
83 192.168.10.0/24:0 -> 137.x.y.r/32:0 => [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
