On Friday 18 February 2005 15:13, Tibbs, Richard wrote: > Dear list. > I have a ipsec road warrior config that allows my laptop so successfully > connect to internal machines through a Bering 1.2 firwall with FreeSwan > 1.99. I also have an openvpn tunnel connected to another firewall > across the internet. Although I have no openvpn running on the laptop, > the command > ipsec eroute > says (apparently) that the route is connected to tun0, instead of > ipsec0. > > Although everything works, why would ipsec make this association? > TIA > Rick. >
Rick, �I have the same thing, but I don't have any tun devices... It looks like you should read that tun[nel] 0x<somehexid>, and not tun0 x <somestring> They are not related. HTH. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
