Hello Ronny, > > No i have not tested that since i can not remove the old hardware before > this new box works. but i have tested iperf outside the tunnel (using a > dnat rule in the remote shorewall) tru both the old and new hardware. > > and then the new box performs just as well, and often sligthly better then > the old one. also tests on local ethernet shows ~99 mbit thruput thru both > old and new box. > > i only notice the speed reduction when i go thru the openswan tunnel. i > think that means it can't be a shorewall or nic issue, but perhaps a > openswan issue. are there any difference in the default crypto performance > 2.4.18 vs 2.4.32 or the crypto used in freeswan vs > openswan ? i thougth both used 3des+md5 > There are no differences in performance that I know of, also openswan is based on freeswan and uses the same underlying "core". Maybe the old NIC has some sort of hardware crypto support (maybe I'm talking rubish here ;)
Eric Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
