On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:34 +0000, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Folks > > sorry for chiming in just like that.
The more the better :) > > Please consider that the implementation of *swan 1.x vs. *swan 2.x has > major differences, especially in the field of oportunistic encryption. > One would expect that the major components of freeswan remained the same > especially the time consuming crypto stuff. IMHO the only real > comparison for Bering uclibc would be to provide an old freeswan > implementation. > > Being in the process of changing a substantial number of Bering boxes to > a new Bering uClibc, most of then running freeswan, I am most interested > in the numbers presented here. > Ill post more numbers as they become available. Ronny Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
