Of course. You have reason, now I have turned it to reading slow and have met my mistake.
Thank you very much. On 1/14/07, Eric Spakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > > > In the documentation "Bering-uClibc Developer Guide" -> "Chapter 3. > > Creating lrp packages with buildpacket" say: > > > > > > Since it is not obvious at first, a little clarification: buildpacket > > creates lrp packages (packagename.lrp) that are defined in buildtool setups > > (unfortunately, those are sometimes also called packages). > > Those two need not have the same name. > > > > > > The package moddb.lrp does not fulfill the last rule. Is it an exception? > > > I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. But it's no problem to have a > "kmodules" name for buildpacket and a moddb name for the package itself > (which is defined in the buildtool.cfg file). The reason for it in this > cased is that the kmodules setup builds all kernel related modules, the > moddb (and moddb_ipv6) packages are just a "side product". Other examples > are the "iptables" setup which create next to iptables.lrp, ip6tables.lrp, > iptutiles.lrp and ip6tutils.lrp. > > Eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
