Call me stupid, but I am running a cascade of two Leaf routers and I would not even start to consider joining them. That said, I have been running them on the same host lately (VMware). That is because I've run out of old small sized boxes and everything I can get my hands on is hugely oversized for the job.
When my needs were smaller I did have ISP connect en TC on the same router, but the current cascaded setup appears to be a lot more stable. I am really happy with that. I do not use Shorewall btw, because I am using a self patched version of iptables with an extension that is not supported by Shorewall. Gordon Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: > I see some emails from March of 2008 discussing some initial work on a 2.6 > branch of Leaf. Can anyone tell me what came of that? > > I found a scenario where a 2.6 branch is necessary. I'm trying to do > multi-ISP & traffic control on the same box, and because Shorewall requires > some 2.6 features to set HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes, I'm unable to do so. > > I'm considering chaining two Leaf Routers together, one to handle the > multiple ISPs and one for TC as a temporary solution, or moving to another > distro for this application, which has its own set of issues. > > Thanks - > > Bob Coffman > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
