07.07.2012 12:43, Jim Ford пишет: > For some years I ran Bering-Leaf on an old desktop PC. I eventually got > fed up with the noise, and also suspicious of the energy it used. More > recently I've been using a Buffalo router running DD-WRT, which seems to > work well. > > It seems to me that DD-WRT does as much as Bering-Leaf. Can anyone point > out where Bering-Leaf scores over DD-WRT please, as I'm reluctant to > completely abandon 'Leaf and am looking into getting it running on a > Raspberry-Pi. > > Jim Hi. IMHO LEAF is placed somewhere between generic fully-featured linux distros and specialized embedded distros/firmwares (like *WRT and embedded platform SDKs). It has packets and packet manager similar to *WRT, but it's better suitable for run-itme package upgrading. From other side, it has mostly vanilla sources; 3rd-part hacks are included only in special cases (like cross-compile hacks, work with uClibc, or kernel patches for CPU that isn't supported in vanilla kernel), also userland packages are generic for arch, not optimized for sub-arch (CPU). In *WRT there are a lot of patches for each package. Also AFAIK *WRT haven't thing like dedicated kernel module package that can be easily modified by user, and haven't probing of modules from tarball stored somewhere on flash.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
