Hello again, > Le 20 sept. 2016 à 02:53, Andrew <ni...@seti.kr.ua> a écrit : > > Hi. > > On 20.09.2016 02:29, Erich Titl wrote: >> Hi Jean-Roch >> >> Am 19.09.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jean-Roch Blais: >>> Hello Erich, >>> >>> thank's for your answer, I commented out background in dhcpcd.conf and >>> voila ! it works as before, great ! , here is the daemon.log: (I changed >>> my IP address .111) >> Very well. We have to think about implications of such aparently >> innocent changes. >> >>> Sep 19 13:16:43 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: version 6.7.1 starting >>> Sep 19 13:16:43 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: soliciting a DHCP lease >>> Sep 19 13:16:43 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: offered 96.23.216.111 from >>> 10.23.113.85 >>> Sep 19 13:16:48 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: leased 96.23.216.111 for 3600 >>> seconds >>> Sep 19 13:16:48 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: adding route to 96.23.216.0/24 >>> Sep 19 13:16:48 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: eth0: adding default route via >>> 96.23.216.1 >>> Sep 19 13:16:48 firewall dhcpcd[11715]: forked to background, child pid >>> 11742 >>> Sep 19 13:16:48 firewall dnsmasq[11767]: started, version 2.75 cachesize 150 >> You can see here, that dnsmasq is started much later than in your >> previous log files. >> >> I _believe_ the behaviour of dnsmasq is the problem here. The timing of >> dhcp is not deterministic and whoever relies on data from a different >> job needs to check the status of this prerequisite. > And even more, I think that it'll be a trouble here when IP address will > change (for ex., during some maintenance in ISP) > >> Nevertheless, glad it works for you. >> I’m also glad it works for me, :-), thank you, but if there is a latent problem with apparently dnsmasq, shouldn’t a regression like that be reported to the maintainer/creator/author ? It use to work quite well before (I’m not even sure of that anymore :-( ), as you can tell from my first mail, when I tried a previous version of dhcpcd. Should someone run more tests to make sure dnsmasq is the problem, before contacting the author, should I ???, can I ???… , I’m warning you :-), I’m no expert ! and I would gladly and happily relie on gurus ! (I’m also a bit lazy as you can guess :-))
Finally as Andrew points out, if there a potential for trouble, which I don’t quite understand, shouldn't it be corrected ? for the future generations ! jrb >> Erich > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
