In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Seaman writes:

>An extensive inventory is necessary to answer that question.   
>Rejecting its need beggars the imagination.  Having spent the time  
>and money needed for such a "does this code need to introduce a DUT1  
>correction?" inventory, we would still be faced with the prospect of  
>what will actually happen to the embargoed leap seconds down the road.

I am not surprised by the fact that you would find such an inventory
heavy lifting, given your occupation.

However, for the approx 200 computers I have in my personal sphere
of influence, I can in less than 1 second split them into these two
categories:

1. Does this computer care if there ever is another leap-second ?
        199

2. Does this computer care if civil time is aligned with earth
   orientation ?
        1 [1]


You're outnumbered Rob.


[1] My Meade ETX125. This may give a hint to my attitude about
    throwing money at astronomers :-)




 
 

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to