In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Seaman writes: Rob,
Discussing leap seconds with you is like discussing papal infalibility with a catholic priest. According to you, people like me know nothing, have no problems and don't understand anything about time. I beg to differ. We are getting to the point where your email behaviour could make me cheer the WP7A proposal on, if for no other reason, then out of spite for your snotty treatment of legitimate concerns. Sometimes, I even wonder if you are staging an intricate PR war against leap-seconds, hoping to get them abolished by behaving as an utterly unreasonable block-head ? The reminder in my .signature normally terminates that train of thought. But to show that I'm, still, trying to take you seriously: What are your comments to my proposal to announce leap seconds 10 years in advance ? Could you live with that ? Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs