Ian Batten said: > I seem to recall that there's some debate as to the leap-year status of 4000CE
Not in either the UK: | Be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid, [...] | that the Years of our Lord 2000, 2400, 2800, and every other fourth | hundred Year of our Lord, from the said Year of our Lord 2000 inclusive, | and also all other Years of our Lord, which by the present Supputation are | esteemed to be Bissextile or Leap Years, shall for the future, and in all | Times to come, be esteemed and taken to be Bissextile or Leap Years, | consisting of 366 Days, in the same Sort and Manner as is now used with | respect to every fourth Year of our Lord. or in those countries conforming to Inter Gravissimas: | idemque ordo intermittendi intercalandique bissextum diem in | quadringentis quibusque annis perpetuo conservetur. It's a leap year. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: cl...@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646 _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
