On 28 January 2011 21:01, Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> wrote: > Taking that one step further, there are many UTCs, but there is only > one TAI, and it is defined by the BIPM. > > Does the BIPM approve of the use of the name TAI for the concept which > is specified by JSR-310? > > If not, how do you justify redefining their product?
If TAI claims a trademark or similar, then I will have to rename or clarify. BIPM has not been consulted. AFAIK, JSR-310 implements TAI correctly post 1972. Stephen _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
