Ian Batten said: > Y2K? You do realise that "The astronomical community started preparing for > Y2K in 1996 and barely had enough time" isn't something to be proud of, don't > you? We'd _finished_ by 1996, having started the programme in about 1989.
Indeed. In 1985 I was sitting in meetings of CSE (remember those?) examiners, pointing out that Y2k was on its way and therefore answers that allowed for 4 digit years should not be penalised. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: cl...@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646 _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
