On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Chris Travers wrote: > see non-JS usability as a requirement for being able to reasonably do > accessibility QA.
Agreed, mostly, but given what I proposed a few days ago as the JS implementation for this, where do you see the accessibility effects? It changes the UI not in the slightest. I do not use windows screen readers, but I know that they do handle JS effects to at least some reasonable extent. Regardless, I would not suggest depending on that unless we could get some actual Wineyes or JFW users in on the testing (I probably could, but it is neither here nor there, because...). I do not see a script which alters the nature of the submitted data, as being a problem from an accessibility prospective, and am interested in what you think I am missing in this respect. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
