On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:52 AM, Armaghan Saqib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe, though not sure, that the warehouses feature has gone > through little or no enhancements in LedgerSMB after the fork was > created from Sql-Ledger. I don't think we have gotten to this module at all. > > In my observation warehouses/shipping functionality in sql-ledger is > seriously flawed. I have detailed my observations on > http://wiki.ledger123.com/index.php?n=User.Shipping The warehouse logic is good enough for some users, but like most of the SQL-Ledger inherited code, it is limited, has some conceptual flaws, and doesn't scale well to larger users. Unless we were to get contributions, I would expect a complete rewrite and redesign of the shipping/warehouse logic somewhere between 1.5 and 2.0. > > It would be great if other users who have been using the > warehouse/shipping could share their insight and tips. Here are things on my wish list: 1) Assign parts to different bins in different warehouses 2) Add a control code field 3) Add address tracking for warehouses 4) Better inventory reports Any others? Best Wishes. Chris Travers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
