I'm still watching this thread, but haven't yet had a chance to experiment
with this. I'd still like to hear if anyone uses ledger in a similar way.
I'll post the results of my experiments, which will probably occur over the
Chrimbo break.
Simon.
>
> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:57:07 -0500 (EST)
> From: Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Suitable for artisan?
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> This is probably after the fact, but for my own knowledge if nothing else,
> as this is a situation I expect to run into eventually:
>
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Simon Haines wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for the follow-up. I probably won't use a trigger to unify the
> > concepts of 'customer' and 'warehouse' because she may eventually want to
> > flog her wares on a web site or direct to customers. I think it would be
> > better to modify the schema to indicate a customer is a consignment
> customer
> > and tie in the warehouse workflow around that. I'll do some experimenting
> > and see how we go.
>
> Just guessing, but couldn't he create a customer group called "consignment
> customers", and then when creating a new customer, have that be a
> component of the trigger--I.E. if it is not set, then no warehouse is
> created?
>
> Been a while since I've actually created any customers (darn it!), so I
> could be forgetting something.
>
> Luke
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
