Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:47:26 -0800, Chris Travers wrote: > >> I agree. I expect that once 1.3 gets out, we will tackle this seriously. >> >> My current thinking is to allow pre-payments on orders, and tie them to >> orders. >> > > Yes, I think prepayments against orders are a very welcome first feature > to support prepayment scenarios. > > With 1.2.x, we're using Sales Orders with prepayment notes (2009-01-29 PD > 150.00) in a fulfillment workflow. > > Our constraints include: a) two-week lead time for vendor ordering, b) > sales order adjustment and invoicing at the date of customer delivery, and > c) additional weeks for multiple third-party payments, where totals are > almost always short-paid by some small amount. > > In our situation nearly every AR invoice would require multiple > reversing transactions, so we elect to defer invoicing until the > transaction is more or less sorted out. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users >
WOW!!! Thank you all for the responses. Didn't realize the scope of what I was asking but the information is invaluable -- thank you again. I love this list. Regards Del ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
