well we didnt make the claim that X exists. The burden of proof is on the "accuser". Otherwise I could call you X and you have to you re not X? hardly fair init..
On top of that, if I was to use YOUR approach: I reckon I saw superman and batman shag in my backyard. Can you prove me wrong? I ve got plenty of comics to show for their existence. fucking hell.. lets keep this real ey? Eric On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Rick Duniec <ri...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > The pope finally admit that Christians should speak the truth, but > forgets to mention that atheists always have > > Atheists ? How the hell do they know any better than the Christians ? Is > there more or less proof or is it exactly the same on both sides ? > Perhaps you mean agnostics - but hardly anybody knows what that really > means anyway. > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER
