Surely it’s potentially slanderous rather than libellous? Spoken word rather than written word?
Either way, it seems to be fair comment on a matter of public importance, therefore not slanderous!! MOT! > From: ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:20:34 +0800 > To: tedhea...@gmail.com > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] Cellino Interview > > Is it the Haigh comments? I'd think fair comment defence is appropriate! :) > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 31 Mar 2014, at 19:14, "Ted" <tedhea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It's just been reported on the Guardian's site as "potentially libellous"! > > > > http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/mar/31/leeds-united-takeover-appeal-monday-massimo-cellino > > > > > > "The Italian was quoted on Sunday night in a potentially libellous > > interview with White Leeds Radio, questioning the club's high wage bill and > > appearing unhappy with recent performances" > > Ted H > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > John 'Grampa' Sykes > Rest In Peace old lad > 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 MARCHING ON TOGETHER