Surely it’s potentially slanderous rather than libellous?
Spoken word rather than written word?

Either way, it seems to be fair comment on a matter of
public importance, therefore not slanderous!! 

 

MOT! 
> From: ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:20:34 +0800
> To: tedhea...@gmail.com
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] Cellino Interview
> 
> Is it the Haigh comments? I'd think fair comment defence is appropriate! :)
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On 31 Mar 2014, at 19:14, "Ted" <tedhea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > It's just been reported on the Guardian's site as "potentially libellous"!
> >  
> > http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/mar/31/leeds-united-takeover-appeal-monday-massimo-cellino
> >  
> >  
> > "The Italian was quoted on Sunday night in a potentially libellous 
> > interview with White Leeds Radio, questioning the club's high wage bill and 
> > appearing unhappy with recent performances"
> > Ted H
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> John 'Grampa' Sykes
> Rest In Peace old lad
> 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
                                          
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

John 'Grampa' Sykes
Rest In Peace old lad
28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013
MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Reply via email to