Yep that's a good point and I like Bamford and as Dave says his goalscoring
record aint bad.
However, I firmly believe that if Eddie had been on from the start against
Barnsely we would have been 2 up at half time. There's no way to prove that
though so for now we go with Bamford.
On Wednesday, 18 September 2019, 16:23:30 BST, Jim Moran
<j...@jimmoran.co.uk> wrote:
Jermaine Beckford has just summed up my thinking exactly:
“They’re two completely different players and at the moment it’s working
really well,” said the retired striker.
“Patrick Bamford is putting in a lot of work and putting the defenders
under lots and lots of pressure, constantly for the 65, 70 minutes he
plays, then Eddie comes on for the last 20, 25, when the defenders are worn
out and tired.
“He’s full of energy, full of beans, his movement is fantastic, not to
mention his confidence in front of goal and his confidence levels, for
someone so young.”
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 16:21, Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>
wrote:
> I think if he gets a new player in who fits better into the machine he'll
> change. It's all about the efficiency of the machine.
>
> Sent from my Mobile.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joe Skinner <jacksonpollocks...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 3:33:04 PM
> To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; David Smail <
> dsm...@dsmail.plus.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Subject: RE: [LU] LU: Eddie v Bamford?
>
> It's more straightforward than that
>
> He plays a player he 'likes' until that player is 1. injured, 2.
> unavailable or has 3. 'let him down'
>
> Likes = rates, believes in, however you want to couch it.
>
> Even if they have fucked up (Ayling), he won't drop them. Either they can
> prove him right and vindicate him, or not. See 3.
>
> I can't think of a player who has missed out, who doesn’t fit the 3
> criteria above. Even the first 2.
>
> He doesn't believe in rotation (unless it is a cup, which he doesn't seem
> to care about anyway)
>
> I can only think a tweak in formation would bring a 'new' player in for
> someone else. E.g. dropping a central midfielder.
>
> He does occasionally change it at half time, which could be an
> acknowledgement he got it wrong, or equally changed to suit the game
> dynamic. E.g. last week Harrison off, Costa on. Was Costa much better? Will
> Harrison start again, most likely.
>
> Unless Bamford is injured, suspended, has a shit fit or strop, I can't see
> him being dropped. Even if he had a goal drought.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> On Behalf Of Richard Naef
> Sent: 18 September 2019 14:47
> To: David Smail <dsm...@dsmail.plus.com>; leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] LU: Eddie v Bamford?
>
> Yes you've missed:
>
> Nketiah just joined, maybe still not up to speed with how the machine works
>
> Bielsa watches him and Bamford every single day
>
> We are Top
>
> Bamford has scored goals and gets on the end of chances
>
> And not being rude, but Bielsa has coached and managed at the very top and
> you have?......
>
> Sent from my Mobile.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of David Smail <
> dsm...@dsmail.plus.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 2:08:29 AM
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Subject: [LU] LU: Eddie v Bamford?
>
> In Bielsa we trust? I don't get why he insists on starting with the semi
> out of form, frustrated and unreliable Bamford when Eddie is so sharp, full
> of confidence , terrorising defences and scoring for fun.
>
> Is Bielsa trying to justify the Bamford purchase price by starting with
> him?
> Is he relying too heavily on Eddie to put things right when Bamford is
> having yet another off day?
>
> Could it be that he's using Bamford to tire out defences to pave the way
> for the fresh legs and scoring habit of Eddie? Perhaps he was so impressed
> by Bamford's training ground exquisite volley that he's convinced he can
>
> replicate the same in real live matches?
>
>
>
> I can't think why Edie wouldn't be in his starting line up. Have I missed
> something?
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
> Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
>
> RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
>
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/
RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
