Damian asked:- > In the interests of transparency, what's this about LUST > having a "backer" > (from one of your earlier mails today)?
You need to keep up Damian - it was well publicised - YEP, YP etc - that was considering a takeover pre-administration with potential funding from a backer who preferred to remain anonymous. > Does this backer (or possibly > ex-backer re-reading your mail) have a position on a > challenge to Bates and > does he or she expect LUST's support, whether tacit or tangible? Why should he/she? I doubt that he/she is a creditor of LUAFC Ltd. > > Is this backer LUST's Astor? What does 'LUST's Astor' mean? Are you insinuating that a democratic and regulated friendly society has behaved in an improper manner? If so, why don't you just say so instead of hiding behind veiled accusations? Cheers Paul _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
